4/5/2023 0 Comments Megaupload dofus book 1![]() Although price regulation can shift some of the congestion alleviation gains back to content providers, it is inapt as a policy instrument, because welfare is proportionally destroyed in the process. This is the downside of network discrimination: Albeit total welfare is increased, content providers will-at least in the short-run-be worse off than under network neutrality. ![]() In the short-run, however, discrimination has no effect on innovation because the ISP expropriates the content providers' increased surplus through the price for priority access. In the long-run, network discrimination leads to infrastructure investments in transmission capacity and encourages innovation on the content provider side. We explicitly consider the adverse effects of traffic prioritization to the remaining best-effort class and find that network discrimination has overall positive effects on welfare, because congestion is better allocated to those content providers with congestion inelastic advertisement revenues. The platform is controlled by a monopolistic Internet service provider, who may choose to sell content providers prioritized access to its customers. We model the main arguments of the net neutrality debate in a two-sided market framework with network congestion sensitive content providers and Internet consumers on each side, respectively. The analysis for each single domain will be followed by an evaluation of how the different impact levels mutually affect one another, in order to synthesize the previous domain-specific analyses and to provide a unified vision (Section 6).įinally, conclusions will be drawn on the overall impact identification and analysis process performed, highlighting the effect of the ETICS framework on the cooperation between operators and other relevant actors as well as proposing future work avenues (Section 7). a set of guidelines and recommendations for properly leveraging expected positive impacts and for containing the effect of expected negative impacts (Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5). a definition of the expected impacts and their mutual relationships and 3. an identification of the stakeholders involved and/or the key issues under scrutiny 2. These methodologies will be applied to obtain: 1. Exploring how these complementary impacts may affect the ETICS project is fundamental for envisioning the evolution of ETICS and for setting appropriate governance policies.įor each domain, the deliverable will first introduce the methodologies employed for carrying out the process of identifying, describing and assessing the different business, legal, socioeconomic, and Net neutrality impacts. The analysis is focused on impacts in four distinct, but strongly interrelated, domains: the business domain, the legal domain, the socioeconomic domain and the Net Neutrality domain. This deliverable provides an analysis and assessment of the impacts of the solutions developed by ETICS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |